This blog is for all those enlightened people out there that are learning the truth about our world and the horrors of our governments. This will eventually cover everything from the beginnings of Freemasonry to genetically modified food and Planet X.
I love this image, though I feel it is quite insulting to monkeys.
The general theory of evolution teaches that planet earth came into existence
5 billion years ago. About 1.5 billion years later, life began to form.
On the earth was an ocean in which primitive single- cell organisms developed by chance. Through mutation, chance variation, and natural selection, these single-celled creatures evolved over millions of years into fish. The fish, in turn, gave rise to amphibians, which evolved into reptiles.
Finally, man developed from a common ancestor, the ape...
This theory may be close to the truth but there is a problem with the timeline as was pointed out by the renowned author and researcher Lloyd Pye.
Like all plants and animals whether wild or domesticated, humans are supposed to be the products of slight, gradual improvements to countless generations spawned by vastly more primitive forebears. This was firmly believed by most scientists in the 1980s, when a group of geneticists decided to try to establish a more accurate date for when humans and chimpanzees split from their presumed common ancestor.
During this genetic species testing something extraordinary and inexplicable about cheetahs was discovered. When the genetic tests were done on them, the surprising result was that in the 50 specimens tested they were all, every one, genetically identical with each other! This means the skin or internal organs of any of the thousands of cheetahs in the world could be switched with the organs of any other cheetah and not be rejected. The only other place such physical homogeneity is seen is in rats and other animals that have been genetically altered in laboratories. The problem of the cheetahs' genetic uniformity is explained by something now known as the "bottleneck effect". What it presumes is that the wild cheetah population--which must have been as genetically diverse as its long history indicates--at some recent point in time went into a very steep population decline that left only a few breeding pairs alive. From that decimation until now, they have all shared the same restricted gene pool.
Unfortunately, there is no record of any extinction events that would selectively remove cheetahs
and there… "Evolution" fails.
In the case of man, paleontologists used fossilized bones to establish a timeline that indicated the split came between five and eight million years ago. That wide bracket could be narrowed, geneticists believed, by charting mutations in human mitochondrial DNA--small bits of DNA floating outside the nuclei of our cells. So they went to work collecting samples from all over the world.
When the results were in, none of the geneticists could believe it.
They had to run their samples through again and again to be certain. Even then, there was hesitancy about announcing it. Everyone knew there would be a firestorm of controversy, starting with the paleontologists--who would be given the intellectual equivalent of a black eye and a bloody nose and their heads dunked into a toilet for good measure! This would publicly embarrass them in a way that had not happened since the Piltdown hoax was exposed.
Despite the usual scientific practice of keeping a lid on data that radically differs from a current paradigm, the importance of this new evidence finally outweighed concern for the image and feelings of paleontologists. The geneticists gathered their courage and stepped into the line of fire, announcing that humans were not anywhere near the official age range of eight to five million years old. Humans were only about 200,000 years old. As expected, the howls of protest were deafening.
Time and much more testing of mitochondrial DNA and male Y-chromosomes now make it beyond doubt that the geneticists were correct. And the paleontologists have come to accept it because geneticists were able to squeeze humans through the same kind of "bottleneck effect" they used to try to ameliorate the mystery of cheetahs.
By doing so, they left paleontologists still able to insist that humans evolved from primitive forebears walking upright on the savannas of Africa as long ago as five million years, but that between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago "something" happened to destroy nearly all humans alive at the time, forcing them to reproduce from a small population of survivors.
In simple terms every stage of our evolution has taken millions of years to complete, except for the last age. You see the evolution from Neanderthal Man of the Ice Age into modern man, identified as existing from between 6,000-20,000 years ago seems to have occurred over a remarkably short period of time to the identified time lines of transition between the other periods. The jump between Neanderthal Man and Modern Man in terms of technological development in tern reflects a vast increase of brain usage, is as clearly definable and as enormous as the gap between any other two given periods of evolution.
How is it then possible for this evolutionary step that should of taken hundreds of thousands of years to have been compressed to a short 'few thousand years'?
Evolutionists have often talked about the Missing Link but as yet have never been able to identify what or who the missing link is. Is the missing link actually a test tube?
Recent archaeological evidence clearly proves beyond any doubt that modern man has to date had little understanding of the world's true ancient history. And this has been clearly shown by the new discovery that the Great Pyramids of Giza are in fact some 10,500 years old where as until three years ago they had been aged somewhere between 3- 6 thousand years old.
If a person chooses to accept the abundance of both historical and modern scientific evidence that is readily available and then treats that evidence as pieces of a Jigsaw puzzle, by placing those pieces all on the same table a picture (however unclear) starts to form.
Both historical and modern evidence consists that we are not alone in this Universe. The same evidence points to extra terrestrial visitors interacting with the earth over a very long period of time. There is no doubt there have been very advanced civilizations on earth prior to the period in which modern man as we perceive him came into existence.
The questions yet to be answered were those civilisations of this planet or from another.
It is now recognised by scientists that the earth is unique in its richness of water and minerals when compared to the other known planets.
It is conceivable that the earth or at least parts of it was mined for those minerals by E.T. civilisations.
Consider current human technology in genetic engineering while we are in the early stages of experimentation in this field what we are currently doing may well of been achieved by far more advanced civilisations (wherever they may of come from) many thousands of years ago.
Consider the possibility that visitors to our planet may of required a work force to assist in their, mining operations or similar.
They would of found a pre-humanoid of low intelligence but of good strength.
How easy may it of been for them to take this Neanderthal and genetically enhance what to them would have been raw material, over a relatively short period of time.
Such a breeding program could conceivably take as short a time as 20- 50 years.
It is known that advanced civilisations existed in several parts of the world and recent discoveries have shown beyond doubt that these civilisations inter-reacted with each other, which in itself is quite astonishing. As travel technology, as we understood it to be, would have totally precluded such contact.
There was therefore a means of travel between these civilisations by a selected few that could not possibly of existed without an alien influence.
The sad reality may have been that the human race is not a result of evolution, but rather is a result of direct interference and genetic manipulation. This theory would clearly explain the otherwise inexplicable where evolution appeared in terms of time, to be inexplicably condensed.
If you choose to except that such a theory is possible you may draw the conclusion that the human race as we now know it first existed as slaves to a greater power.
With reference to the Old Testament ' The leaders of the ancient Egyptian civilisation were considered Gods.' Accurate translation of the Dead Sea scrolls talks about "The Gods" As opposed to one God.
Any entity that may have been extra terrestrial would of most certainly have seen to have the powers and the knowledge of Gods.
Moses when he led the people out of slavery may have been stopping the cycle of human subordanance to the greater E.T. power.
What may have made his flight from Egypt possible was the sheer weight of numbers of the people he lead and the possibility that he received direct help from one of 'The Gods'.
Astonishingly enough the evidence of the Old Testament points heavily in this direction.
That which was reported as historical fact of the time has to date only been interpreted within the very narrow vision and version of the Theologians. To limit interpretations of such documents borders on criminality, as under these circumstances and restrictions, it would be almost impossible to discover the truth of the earth's history.
It is important to remember that such theories do not preclude their being a God but rather include the possibilities that more advance civilisations from elsewhere may have played at being God…
Whatever the truth may be... "Never Stop Questioning".
